Posts Tagged ‘Criminal Science Fraud’

Psychiatry is HATE, Psychiatry is LIES, Psychiatry is MURDER.

March 7, 2011

The assertion that our thoughts and feelings occur as the result of chemical reactions in the brain over which we do NOT have fundamental control ie our ‘genetics’ controls this, is tantamount to the claim that we are “Being controlled by other unknown forces”, and as such meets the clinical definition of psychotic ideation put forth by this very industry whose foundational tenets in fact meet its own definition of psychosis!!

No tests, no pathology, no etiology, no confirmatory physical abnormality = NO DISEASE.

Psychiatry is a discipline wholly devised, designed and dedicated to elevating its practitioners socio-economically above others around them in the culture – even if it means destroying their culture, belief systems, or physical and mental health as a means to this end.

Psychiatrists should study and forcibly medicate THEMSELVES – for they are professional voyeurs and intellectual perverts whose obsessive controlling natures drive them to vicitmize other citizens for those people’s natural human inconsistencies and vulnerabilities.

Psychiatry is HATE, Psychiatry is LIES, Psychiatry is MURDER.

Psychiatry : The Sowing and Selling of Insanity

January 23, 2010

Our modern culture is literally teaching ‘mental illness’ to children in our schools.

Do the ‘issues’ of our modern age manifest themselves in a cultural vacuum? I think not – by the time I was 7 years old, insanity as a behavioural model was clearly represented to me repeatedly. As these perverse understandings of such purportedly inescapable and uncontrollable behavioural models are forcefully disseminated throughout our culture, kids and teenagers inevitably adopt and attach them to feelings of insecurity, stress, or identity issues.

Identity being key here – because the underlying assumptions represented by the Politically Correct secular teachings that dominate our learning, medical, and even entertainment institutions impose an effective belief system of chemical determinism among the general population.

Thus, even the slightest, most common and understandable inconsistency of the self can immediately trigger a cascading tsunami of doubt and internal fear that such ‘inappropriate’ thoughts and feelings indicate the onset of genetically triggered, physiologically based, unstoppable and uncontrollable mental dysfunction, or so called ‘mental illness’.

But why would it be ‘abnormal’ to think about having an eating disorder – or even stabbing, fucking, and/or shooting your classmates or fellow employees, for that matter? Why would it be strange for someone at the wrong end of a power equation to harbour thoughts of violence against those they effectively suffer the threat or reality of violence from? Claiming surprise and shock, and proposing illustrious theories of the allegedly ‘mysterious’ origins of such behaviour is either wholly dishonest and corrupt, or displays patent stupidity and incompetence on the part of the ‘thought leaders‘ who would so cynically or blindly make such suggestions.

I challenge anyone to show me someone who has exhibited such pathological thought patterns or behaviour without being first exposed to the idea that such phenomena exist as a clear and uncontrollable, ‘genetically’ predetermined potentiality of the human experience.

Author Robert Whitaker calls it ‘Chemical Reductionism’. Famed Psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz takes extreme issue with such dangerous nonsense, stating simply : “There are no causes for human behaviour – only reasons.”

Massive efforts plainly are being undertaken to inform the general public that fundamental control of the self exists by definition beyond their reach, awareness, understanding and control – and places this power in a force only understood by the ‘new priests’ of our day i.e. ‘doctors’ or ‘psychiatrists’. This is both a belief system worthy of a Jonestown cult, and a clear recipe for madness and mental collapse amongst the general population.

The industry that has grown up around alleged physiologically based ‘mental illness’ seeks new patients who are as young as possible, because it is clearly ‘understood’ and preached by this discipline that most people who enter the mental health system require medication for LIFE. Thus, the younger the new patient, the more profits are maximized. This is a business model, and nothing else – and based entirely on phony, fraudulent science, it threatens to plunge our culture into a disintegration that could only be described as Satanic in nature and scope – if it is not doing so already.

Open Letter to Prime Minister Steven Harper of Canada

January 16, 2010

Dear Prime Minister Harper,

Re: The Climategate Scandal at the University of East Anglia (CRU)

I am writing to draw your government’s attention to the ongoing scandal unfolding in England regarding the devastating corruption of the science surrounding the now clearly fraudulent claims that Human behaviour is putting our survival – and in fact that of the planet Earth itself – in grave jeopardy.

I feel compelled to write your offices to point out the lies, subterfuge and misinformation in the British Government’s response to this matter, and request that you, as our country’s leader, issue a public statement condemning this continued effort to suppress the truth – a truth that I am under the clear impression Canada’s Steven McIntyre has already brought to your attention several years ago.

There is too much to challenge robustly in one letter. Instead I shall for the moment confine myself to three basic issues; (1.) the use of ‘private’ unaccountable police in the CRU investigation; (2.) the deceitful dropping of 806 ‘cold’ weather stations from the 6000 global set in one year and (3.) the facts on sea level rises that conflict with assertions that “severe impacts” of climate change must be dealt with “now.”

First, I wish to register my protest in the strongest possible terms that a privately run secret police unit, the National Domestic Extremism Team (NDET), is conducting the criminal investigation into the CRU scandal – yet only into the theft of the information, blatantly ignoring its clearly criminal nature! If someone had broken into the CRU and found a meth lab, would that not overshadow any search for a mere trespasser?

NDET is directly answerable to the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Because ACPO is not a public body but rather a private limited company, NETCU is exempt from freedom of information laws (FOIA) and other kinds of public accountability, even though they are funded by the Home Office and deploy police officers from regional forces. What further disturbs me is that ACPO cannot be relied upon to handle this investigation when ACPO have a vested interest in the outcome being that their pension fund is invested heavily in environmental stocks. So is this truly a reasonable interpretation of an “independent” investigation and will the British Labour Government continue to conduct business like this if re-elected at the upcoming general election?

As to the science, we know at minimum, from the admissions contained in the leaked emails, that the climate data analysis by CRU between 2006-2009 was ‘fudged.’ This has been confirmed by the latest peer-reviewed literature.

Firstly, I wish to refer to the leaked emails and the ‘documents/HARRY_READ_ME.txt’ files. These files covers CRU’s latest work from 2006-2009 and CRU scientist, ‘Harry’ admits the climate data CRU possesses is unusable:

“getting seriously fed up with the state of the Australian data. so many new stations have been introduced, so many false references.. so many changes that aren’t documented… “

‘Harry’ then later adds, “I am very sorry to report that the rest of the databases seem to be in nearly as poor a state as Australia was.”

Clearly, from the evidence to hand, these climatologists are poor data handlers. When you then go beyond the 1,000+ emails and look deeper at the meta data coding within the rest of the leaked 62MB goldmine things get far worse. ‘Harry’ admits he has no training in FORTRAN. He muddles by attempting to teach himself and gamely trying to analyze so much “poor” and “false” data. As we have read, for ‘Harry’ matters go from bad to worse.

Frankly, Prime Minister, to use the words of one of the UK climatologists, this whole charade is a “travesty” and the scientists involved are incompetent. But from incompetence they plunge the depths into wilful deceit and unlawful conduct. The proof of a conspiracy grows as we read the ‘hockey teams’’ own words. For over three years they admit to have been deliberately foiling FOIA requests. Now we have reached the farcical position where neither the UK Government nor the climatologists involved will come clean with the truth in the midst of the most severe winter in 30 years when newspapers predict deaths due to cold in the tens of thousands and Britain’s transport network liable to be thrown into chaos with just a few inches of snowfall. It is a total dereliction of the UK Government’s duties to continue to rely on and defend secretly concocted junk science for what they claim is “an issue of unrivalled public importance.”

I can assure you a cacophony of rage is building online over these matters as more ordinary citizens come to the Internet looking for the facts that the UK Govt. and the mainstream media are reluctant to address. Canada should demand that they uphold the principles of the Freedom of Information Act; expedite the processing and completion of all past and pending FOIA requests so that everyone can see that they value independent analysis within a framework supportive of transparent and honest government.

But as British officials and scientists appear to have forgotten, please allow me to remind everyone how the scientific method works. It is incumbent on the purveyor of any theory of science to provide the proof and permit sceptical testing of it. In fact, scepticism is the birthright of every scientist. But sceptics cannot test this junk theory because every one of your cited data sources denies examination of their methodologies and calculations – we are only presented with conclusions. Frankly, Minister, that’s just not good enough and history will regard you and your ilk with dismay for your hubris and contempt of reason and fair play.

CRU, like NASA and NOAA, want to treat their information as proprietary to them but unlike private corporations, they have no such privileges. Publicly funded repositories of data for use by educational and research institutions are obliged to properly maintain the original data, make it available to anyone who is qualified to work with it, AND document each and every adjustment made and why. But what I must now confront you with is the charge that government – funded scientists have been systematically and cynically dropping ‘cold’ rural ground measuring stations from the global set so as to skew the official government results. There is now a list of 806 weather stations that were dropped from the total of 6000 worldwide in a single year with no explanation from the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN). The only fact in common that we can so far deduce from these dropped sites is that they exhibit a tendency to be located in rural areas. You will find further detailed information in regard to those 806 dropped weather stations here :

http://johnosullivan.livejournal.com/#post-johnosullivan-4521

The Urban Heat Island effect (UHI) tells us that rural stations are free from the levels of secondary heat contamination generally found in cities, towns and airports. The additional heating within UHI areas increases measured temperatures by a magnitude of several degrees (McKitrick and Michaels 2007). The only possible motive I can infer from our ongoing findings is that corrupt climatologists are dropping ‘cold’ ground weather stations to make the world’s climate appear warmer than it actually is.

So far an analysis is still progressing. But already I can report to you that of the dropped Australian and New Zealand stations most are rural stations (e.g. Port Nelson, Ruttan Lake, Joutel). We shall continue to painstakingly analyze all stations on this list to see if we can substantiate what at the moment, appears to be a conspiracy to omit ‘cold’ rural stations. What we are seeing appears to confirm what peer reviewed papers have found, namely that artificial warming is contaminating 30-50% of the data cited by official sources. In effect, rather than adjusting their calculations to remove the UHI effect, the scientists are actually adding extra weighting to increase the distortion from UHI.

It has been determined that the station count for the U.S. (in the GHCN v2_mean file) dropped from 1177 to 136 in April 2006. This has been confirmed by importing the data and by doing a simple count of all station ID’s beginning with “425″ for the year 2006. Replication is straightforward. This is a trivial task for any application developer to write the code to import this data and then analyze it. The most significant observation noted is that most of the stations left in the U.S. are airports (for the years 2006 and going forward). Please check these facts for yourself and see that a fraud has been committed.

Moreover, the lack of transparency and unlawful conduct exhibited by Professor Phil Jones et al. may allow us to infer that the truth is being deliberately and zealously kept from the public. In essence, the conclusions that many cited references provide about the climate are entirely worthless and may be adjudged as GIGO (‘Garbage In, Garbage Out!’).

Also, I cannot conclude without addressing the most absurd assertion made in all of this – that there is a pattern of warming causing rising see levels, attributed by British Minister of State for Climate, Joan Ruddock, to “a direct result of human activities.” This Minister is either inadvertently and ignorantly exaggerating the science or she is flatly lying. To put this crazy statement into perspective, even the MET Office does not dispute that the overall rise in temperature is merely less than one degree centigrade since 1860 and with zero additional rises in sea levels on top of natural variation, so how can the UK Govt. stand by this statement? The matter demands clarification – please quantify and differentiate the amounts of sea level and temperature rise that are being attributed to human behaviour and to nature, and speak to this in the House.

From my understanding, the debate on current and past sea level rises is non-existent. But, I suspect, Ms. Ruddock knows quite well that we currently face no danger of problematic sea level rises because, like any of us, she is able to check the best oceanographers’ peer-reviewed science that refutes the guesstimates and lies of climatologists on this issue. Sea levels are rising no faster than 2mm per annum – a wholly natural rate for the current Holocene interglacial whereby concomitant ice melt has been occurring for the past 11,000 years – way before human industrialization. In 2007 Simon Holgate of the U.K.’s Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, produced a history of global sea level from 1904 to 2003 based upon a set of reliable, long-term observations from nine tide gauge stations scattered around the world and he could not find any sea level rises attributable to man-made emissions of CO2. Holgate is renowned as one of the world’s leading oceanographers

But further, may I also suggest you look at what the oceanographers at the University of Colorado have to say on this issue. They rely on the Jason-1 Calibration and TOPEX Calibration and attribute no sea level rises to mankind in any of their work. Their measurements concur neatly with Holgate’s numbers.

Other oceanographers in peer-reviewed papers such as Antonov et al. (2005); Ishii et al. (2005) and Willis et al. (2005) all report current rises equal to seven inches per century with no human signal whatsoever. These oceanographers have proved that current sea level rise is entirely consistent with natural Holocene ice melt. Thus the statement that sea levels are rising “as a direct result of human activities” is patently false – please demand that the UK Govt. withdraw it or stand accused by their critics as the lying scaremongers that they are!

Ms. Ruddock has also stated, “the temporal and spatial pattern of observed warming cannot be explained by natural causes alone.” This is a vacuous non-statement. No one is disputing that human emissions may have ‘some’ impact on climate. But does the one degree centigrade overall rise we have experienced since 1860 justify the exorbitantly expensive policy measures of being forced upon the peoples of the world without election or referendum? The answer must be a resounding, ’No!’ when we bear in mind that the Earth has shown no warming trend for 15 years, based on analysis of the raw and combined CRU, NASA and NOAA numbers. So with no current decadal warming trend there is no justification in logic for the need to “take action now” as some insist. Look at the weather in England, Prime Minister, and see that after six cooler years in a row we are now in the midst of the worst winter in the northern hemisphere for 30 years. The UK govt is being criticized from all quarters for its policy failures to cope with these winter conditions. The travel chaos and rising death toll associated with severe cold proves the hardships of a colder climate outweigh those of the warmer one we lived through in the last quarter of the old century and which ended in 1998.

As I believe and hope you are already aware, the scientific community is increasingly turning against the ‘theory’ of man made global warming (AGW) because, unlike the period from 1975-1998 warmer temperatures no longer correlate with rising levels of carbon dioxide. Thus with no correlation it is irrational to argue for causation. The so-called consensus among scientists on man-made climate change has evaporated since ‘Climategate’, while the latest peer-reviewed paper by German physicists, Dr’s. Gerlich and Tscheuschner thoroughly debunks the whole greenhouse gas theory. These German scientists prove that even if CO2 concentrations double (a prospect even global warming advocates admit is decades away), the thermal conductivity of air would not change more than 0.03% so that it is thus impossible for us to witness a greater rate of warming than seen already in the past 150 years. Gerlich and Tscheuschner further disprove that there exists a mechanism whereby carbon dioxide in the cooler upper atmosphere exerts any thermal ‘forcing’ effect on the warmer surface below. To do so would violate both the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics :

(http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v4.pdf).

Prime Minister, please help to bring an end to this climate farce. I urge you to conduct a truly independent review of the facts I now present to you rather than rely on fraudulent data that has been exposed as such.

Let me finish by commenting on the cynical and wholly perverse use of children in the perpetrating of this fraud. For example,contrary to the UK High Court ruling made by Mr Justice Burton of 2007, the Al Gore film, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ is still being shown in UK schools without clarification or caveat that this so called ‘documentary’ contains nine ‘errors’ that his lordship ruled were in ‘ the context of alarmism and exaggeration.‘ Just like Mr. Gore, the UK government has failed to present the facts honestly and with transparency and have turned to falsehoods to claim that climate change, a natural phenomenon is bringing “severe impacts” and it’s our fault. I hope that after the general election we shall see a new government that upholds the truth. But judging by the current climate stance of UK officials, I see little prospect for the world’s youth while their future lies in the hands of those who seek to OBSCENELY profit from a future of crippling taxes as a direct consequence of these and similar policies.

Yours most sincerely,

Adam Cassidy
Vancouver, BC

(Please feel free to replace my name with yours, and copy and paste this into your own email to PM Harper at HarpeS@parl.gc.ca and pm@pm.gc.ca)

Al Gore – Sun God Shaman?

January 5, 2010

If you actually read the science, you’ll find it to be well known that the Earth experiences 30-35 year temperature cycles. Thus any ‘climatologist’ who supposedly didn’t know this would be considered a fool amongst their colleagues.

In fact, if this is your job, you can’t NOT know about Earth’s 30-35 year temperature cycles!

Thus many scientists have been waiting for this latest warming ‘wave’ within the greater ‘tide’ to break, which is very likely what we are seeing right now with all of this record winter weather around the world. It snowed last year in Baghdad, for crying out loud – first time in 100 years!! And now England is snowed in, and the fraudsters have not-so-subtly changed their rhetoric from ‘Global Warming’ to ‘Climate Change Crisis’.

But this is only a re-branding of their fraud. Al Gore and crew attempted to use an upward fluctuation in these cycles to spread terror for power and profit, just as Inca and Mayan Priests once used their knowledge of eclipses to intimidate their populations, and pretend a direct connection to God.

The motives of this are plain : Al Gore has a Carbon Credit Exchange waiting in the wings, developed with David Blood (formerly of Goldman Sachs) and, early in its conception, Ken Lay of Enron. These two crooks have already played key roles in collapsing our economies, in their quest for profits under the new ‘Scarcity Capitalism‘ Lay was so fond of, and we are about to hand over our economies to their sinister, vile, greedy machinations.

If you look back at the only really solid data we have, which of course only covers the last 100 years or so – you will see the two previous cycles were a little longer than this one. If you go long range, you see that overall, we ARE in a warming cycle. It’s been warmer centuries ago, it’s hardly a bad thing, there’s nothing we can do about it anyway, so we prepare, is all. Big deal.

But this game plays out like this – it’s not ’settled science’, but it is still fairly well known that the latest upward swing would lead to a dip – and we would have a carbon tax imposed just in time for a 35 year downswing in temperatures, when our energy needs would skyrocket. The payout would go beyond bags of money. It would be Global Fascism at its purest and finest.

Thus Al Gore et al started to go into the schools in the 90’s, to indoctrinate a generation of children in their fraudulent cult – it’s easy to see that it’s been nothing less than timed, if you just do a little ‘hindcasting‘ of your own. If this natural upward fluctuation in temperature cycles were to have lasted an extra year or two – assuming we are looking at the onset of the dip we should be and would be expecting if we had honest leaders who weren’t trying to enslave us with phony science – there would be an army of eco-police coming out to do battle against evil polluting humanity over the next year or two, and all the laws would have been in place.

It is nothing less than FOOLISH to abandon one source of energy without first developing another. To attempt to force the issue with a blatant scientific fraud destroys any alleged value in such an effort – in case anyone has forgotten, Stalin taught us the true meaning of “The End Justifies The Means“.

What Al Gore and the rest of the Climate Clown Cabal did – and are still trying to do! – is TREASON. Anybody remember what that is? Well, I’ll give you a hint – before there can be treason, you need to still have a country first.

ClimateGate driven by Activist Ego and Corporate Greed

January 2, 2010

This whole ClimateGate / WarmerGate thing is driven by activist ego, self-perpetuating oligarchal bureaucracy, and corporate greed, a bizarre intertwining of obsessive agendas that might be compared to say, the NDP teaming up with the separtist Bloc in order to topple the government and save Canada from ourselves.

I was a cult member, too, until I found out I was being lied to. Since we’re all too stupid to be allowed to look over the data ourselves, I don’t give a crap what these IPCC people say anymore. It’s ALL bullshit, as far as I’m concerned.

You see, I live my life by the clearly weird and unstable idea that if someone lies to me once, I can no longer trust anything they will ever say, or have ever said to me.

All this doubt and hand wringing over how to look at this situation is such garbage. It’s like catching your lover on the phone with someone else, then having to endure the humiliating and painful insult of them accusing you of paranoia. Once someone lies to you, like it or not, that’s pretty much the end of THAT.

Let me illustrate my point by revisiting a famous scene from the classic ‘Dirty Harry‘, when Clint Eastwood is being accused of overreacting to an alleged culprit caught-in-the-act :

Mayor : Callahan!

Callahan : Sir?

Mayor : I don’t want any more trouble like you had last year in the Filmore District… understand? That’s my policy.

Callahan : Yeh, well, when an adult male is chasing a female with intent to commit rape, I shoot the bastard. That’s my policy.

Mayor : Intent? How did you establish that?

Callahan : When a naked man is chasing a woman through an alley with a butcher knife and a hard-on, I figure he isn’t out collecting for the Red Cross.

Chief : He’s got a point.

Come on, folks – these guys have been caught with their pants down. Everyone says the ‘Denialists’ are being funded by Big Oil, and that’s just another scare tactic at this point. But WHO is funding the Chicken Littles who are Crying Big Bad Wolfie?

Is this really being driven by science, or is it a giant scam growing out of what is essentially a belief system to many people? Has the world become so tainted with cynicism that our tax dollars now go to create self-important officials indulging their perverse obsessive controlling disorders with the development of new ways to tax the populations under their control, as well as new populations to tax?

That’s how it appears to me – this is Taxation-As-Industry, and its roots are in the critically misguided impression so many people have that taxes somehow are a tangible commodity that can and should be expanded upon just like any other enterprise.

However. this latest debacle is not going to do a thing to stop Global Warming, if it is even happening, and it’s not going to do much for the poor countries of the world, either.

We need to move on alternative energy, and an interest free currency, and then export these ideas and technologies around the world, THAT is the way to spread our wealth and knowledge around!

I’m consistently amazed with the pitiably shallow conviction that transferring a bunch of numbers back to the Third World is going to do anything but create yet another giant bureaucracy and yet another industry teeming with rich, self-important brokers who produce nothing of any real value, yet earn literally ten to a THOUSAND times the average household’s income.

Can we even afford installing another layer of the Super Rich to fawn ourselves over? And what real value will we be giving to the ‘Developing World’? No one involved is going to be making anything anyone can eat or live in or really use in any meaningful way. It’s not even paper anymore, so you can’t even start a fire.

In any case, what happened to the leftie conviction that this whole Capitalist Imperialistic mess we’re all pigging out on here in the West is built upon cheap labour in the Third World?

It’s a laughable idea, from that perspective – we will be ramping up our exploitation of cheap overseas labour, in order to pay them the bill for using our own resources. Meanwhile the more that developing nations burn, they have to pay, too, right?

Wrong. If a ‘developing’ country’s CO2 emissions growth does not exceed their GDP growth, they are considered to have made a ‘reduction’ in their CO2 usage.

So as long as the numbers keep going up the right way, the so called ‘developing world’ can light itself on fire, and still BE ASSIGNED BY THE UN Carbon Credits based on the completely unquantified notion that they are moving toward a cleaner and more efficient economy. Thus, they can blanket the landscape with industry, and yet STILL sell us Carbon Credits!?!?

The only thing that this will lead to is ALL manufacturing moving overseas, leaving us to do…what, exactly?

Judging from the number of people unemployed in the US right now, I wager that joining the army en masse just might be the way to go for a lot of folks. Or maybe just start your own.

So there’s your fuzzy minded, lefty utopian intellectual snake oil that’s not even being peddled anymore – the plan is to legislate people into buying it.

But it won’t work. Just as the unbridled corporate slobberfest that caused last year’s collapse of the Giant Pyramid Scam our current economy is has literally devalued the very object of people’s obsessive greed, so too will the foolish wielding of Political Power by people with fundamentalist agendas render these offices irrelevant, as people turn away from their nonsense to concentrate on the tangible realities they must face on a day to day basis.

If we’d spent the past ten years – and Ten Trillion Dollars – on seriously developing alternative energy, rather than a brutal takeover of another people’s land and resources, we could be exporting these innovations right now, shutting down every last fossil fuel powered plant in favour of cheap, renewable energy, and ushering in a new world of peace, prosperity, and spiritual growth such as can only be imagined in one’s wildest fantasies.

A tax on Human Life itself?

December 29, 2009

I’d like to draw people’s attention to a very interesting video on this site here :

http://www.webcommentary.com/signrep.php

Where you will find a Canadian scientist Dr. Tim Ball expressing shock and outrage over the clearly criminal ClimateGate scandal.

You’ll also find a link there to sign their petition – I believe it is Lord Monckton’s, in fact!

I have to ask – What is the MATTER with people?!?!?

A tax on CO2 is literally a tax on BREATHING. Does it get any more Orwellian than THAT?!?

Are you willing to have your body’s annual CO2 output evaluated by some stranger whose salary is the sole purpose of the tax which they will assess upon your very person?

CO2 is NOT A POLLUTANT. To criminalize CO2 is to CRIMINALIZE HUMAN LIFE.

We do not live in a Democracy anymore, but a Hypocracy!!

This could not be more serious! If we allow this complete fraud to force us into a treaty, we will be effectively paying taxes to a permanent, unelected, bureaucracy of career civil servants in another country, FOREVER!

Moreover, they can come into our country, and tell us what we can and can’t do. Since this is all centred around our CO2 emissions, walking down the street, and even just being ALIVE will qualify as aspects of your life that this unelected, unrepresented bureaucratic body will be able to dictate terms to!

It will be the end of the sovereignty of whatever nation you are a part of today, no matter where you live.

It WILL BE EFFECTIVE WORLD GOVERNMENT.

Of course we need to get off oil – but this is NOT the way. We should instead TAKE BACK our governments, and start spending the TRILLION DOLLARS A YEAR they collectively spend on WAR, and put it into renewable energy sources that we can share with the world.

It’s either that, or we are very likely headed for either global conflict, fascist global world government, such as the one just attempted in Copenhagen, or more likely BOTH.

Anyone who has read The Handmaid’s Tale can get a picture of the world we are being led into.

We must mobilize to stop this NOW.